<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Global Resorts Network versus Carbon Copy Pro</title>
	<link>http://www.blogglobalresortsnetwork.com/2008/06/18/global-resorts-network-versus-carbon-copy-pro.html</link>
	<description>What Global Resorts Network is and why it is an unbeatable business.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.blogglobalresortsnetwork.com/2008/06/18/global-resorts-network-versus-carbon-copy-pro.html#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 18:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blogglobalresortsnetwork.com/2008/06/18/global-resorts-network-versus-carbon-copy-pro.html#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Thanks Mark, always good to hear both sides.
~~Greg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Mark, always good to hear both sides.<br />
~~Greg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark D Worthen PsyD</title>
		<link>http://www.blogglobalresortsnetwork.com/2008/06/18/global-resorts-network-versus-carbon-copy-pro.html#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark D Worthen PsyD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 05:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blogglobalresortsnetwork.com/2008/06/18/global-resorts-network-versus-carbon-copy-pro.html#comment-3</guid>
		<description>I'm with Carbon Copy Pro so, as you might expect, I disagree with your assessment. 

Before I explain why most of your points are wrong, allow me to say that I think GRN is a good business. If someone is interested in the travel industry or thinks they might enjoy it, I recommend GRN to them. 

On a related note, I don't need to bash another company to make my company look better. Maybe you decided to compare GRN with Carbon Copy Pro because you might get some search engine traffic using the CCPro name. Or maybe you think that bashing CCPro makes GRN look better--a dubious assumption, I would suggest.

Incorrect statements in your post:

1) MLM generally refers to companies with a commission plan that pays out on *multiple* levels. CCPro has only two levels: Your sales and the sales of the people you bring into the business. Calling it an *affiliate* program would be more accurate, although "direct sales" is the term most often used. 

2) You write:

"The carbon copy company is definitely focused on being a business, and there are no perks just for being a member."

First of all, what is wrong with a company that is "focused on being a business?"

Second, there are dozens of benefits for being a member so it's hard for me to understand where you're coming from there.

3. You write:

"Since this program is so expensive, it seems hardly worth it, or even possible for most people to be able to join."

You seem to be arguing that if the start-up cost is higher than your company's start-up cost, then it's "expensive." 

It's all relative, isn't it? I mean, there are many network marketing companies where you can get started for under $200. And, on the other end of the spectrum, most franchise opportunities are at least $100,000 if not one to two million to start. 

Also, you're making a huge assumption when you write that it's not possible for most people to join because of the start-up cost. I've had some team members come in Platinum Plus and I've had college students start as Referring Consultants and work their way up to m1 and probably beyond. 

There are a lot of people who will easily spend $10k to $20k to start a lucrative home-based business. It's mostly about your mindset: If you assume that people can't afford your product or service then you will attract people who can't and you'll turn away people who can. 

4. You assert that our training programs are good but that GRN's are just as good and provided without cost. 

Have you compared in detail the training provided by both companies? Were you a member of CarbonCopyPRO? If not, how did you acquire access to the private training sites for a detailed review?

I encourage you to do more homework before posting inaccurate information. Better yet, don't boost your company by putting another one down. If you infuse your comments with negativity that is exactly what you will attract.

Sincerely,

Mark
435-647-6706</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Carbon Copy Pro so, as you might expect, I disagree with your assessment. </p>
<p>Before I explain why most of your points are wrong, allow me to say that I think GRN is a good business. If someone is interested in the travel industry or thinks they might enjoy it, I recommend GRN to them. </p>
<p>On a related note, I don&#8217;t need to bash another company to make my company look better. Maybe you decided to compare GRN with Carbon Copy Pro because you might get some search engine traffic using the CCPro name. Or maybe you think that bashing CCPro makes GRN look better&#8211;a dubious assumption, I would suggest.</p>
<p>Incorrect statements in your post:</p>
<p>1) MLM generally refers to companies with a commission plan that pays out on *multiple* levels. CCPro has only two levels: Your sales and the sales of the people you bring into the business. Calling it an *affiliate* program would be more accurate, although &#8220;direct sales&#8221; is the term most often used. </p>
<p>2) You write:</p>
<p>&#8220;The carbon copy company is definitely focused on being a business, and there are no perks just for being a member.&#8221;</p>
<p>First of all, what is wrong with a company that is &#8220;focused on being a business?&#8221;</p>
<p>Second, there are dozens of benefits for being a member so it&#8217;s hard for me to understand where you&#8217;re coming from there.</p>
<p>3. You write:</p>
<p>&#8220;Since this program is so expensive, it seems hardly worth it, or even possible for most people to be able to join.&#8221;</p>
<p>You seem to be arguing that if the start-up cost is higher than your company&#8217;s start-up cost, then it&#8217;s &#8220;expensive.&#8221; </p>
<p>It&#8217;s all relative, isn&#8217;t it? I mean, there are many network marketing companies where you can get started for under $200. And, on the other end of the spectrum, most franchise opportunities are at least $100,000 if not one to two million to start. </p>
<p>Also, you&#8217;re making a huge assumption when you write that it&#8217;s not possible for most people to join because of the start-up cost. I&#8217;ve had some team members come in Platinum Plus and I&#8217;ve had college students start as Referring Consultants and work their way up to m1 and probably beyond. </p>
<p>There are a lot of people who will easily spend $10k to $20k to start a lucrative home-based business. It&#8217;s mostly about your mindset: If you assume that people can&#8217;t afford your product or service then you will attract people who can&#8217;t and you&#8217;ll turn away people who can. </p>
<p>4. You assert that our training programs are good but that GRN&#8217;s are just as good and provided without cost. </p>
<p>Have you compared in detail the training provided by both companies? Were you a member of CarbonCopyPRO? If not, how did you acquire access to the private training sites for a detailed review?</p>
<p>I encourage you to do more homework before posting inaccurate information. Better yet, don&#8217;t boost your company by putting another one down. If you infuse your comments with negativity that is exactly what you will attract.</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>Mark<br />
435-647-6706</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
